
pmid: 16730133
To identify factors in breast cancer patients that predict the pathologic results of re-excision for close or positive margins and to determine the effect on local control.We divided 1,044 patients with Stage I-II breast cancer with a close (< or =2 mm) or positive margin after initial excision into three groups. Group 1 included 199 patients without additional excision, Group 2 included 546 patients with re-excision found to be free of cancer, and Group 3 included 299 patients with re-excision and residual cancer. All patients were treated with radiotherapy with a median follow-up of 6.7 years.The 10-year local control rate was 95% for Group 1 and 94% for Groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.788). Of the 846 patients, 65% had no residual disease on re-excision and 35% did have residual tumor. The factors significantly associated with positive re-excision findings were initial positive margins, positive nodes, Stage T2 tumor, and an extensive intraductal component. The 10-year local control rate was 95% for Group 2 vs. 91% for Group 3 (p = 0.038).The low recurrence rates seen in this study suggest that selected patients with non-negative margins, particularly those with a low risk of having residual disease at re-excision, may be treated with radiotherapy.
Adult, Reoperation, Chi-Square Distribution, Neoplasm, Residual, Biopsy, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Mastectomy, Segmental, Combined Modality Therapy, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Logistic Models, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged
Adult, Reoperation, Chi-Square Distribution, Neoplasm, Residual, Biopsy, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Mastectomy, Segmental, Combined Modality Therapy, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Logistic Models, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
