
handle: 11365/1060960 , 11390/1131937 , 2108/59448
Abstract This paper uses data envelopment analysis to assess the operational performance of 28 Italian airports during the period of 2000 through 2006. Recent developments in bootstrapping techniques are used to correct total factor productivity estimates for bias and to assess the uncertainty surrounding such estimates. This study found that the Italian airport industry experienced a significant technological regress, with few airports achieving an increase in productivity led by improvements in efficiency. Moreover, the paper shows that the form of ownership (public majority vs. private majority) of an airport management company does not significantly affect performance. In contrast, this type of the concession agreement has positive and significant effects on airport productivity. Finally, the paper highlights the existence of a productivity gap between airports located in the North-Central part of the country and those located in the south.
Economics and Econometric, Malmquist, Management and Accounting (all), 330, Italian airport, Management Science and Operations Research, 650, Bootstrap, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Bootstrap; DEA; Italian airports; Malmquist; Business, Management and Accounting (all); Economics and Econometrics; Management Science and Operations Research; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Settore ING-IND/35 - INGEGNERIA ECONOMICO-GESTIONALE, DEA, Business
Economics and Econometric, Malmquist, Management and Accounting (all), 330, Italian airport, Management Science and Operations Research, 650, Bootstrap, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Bootstrap; DEA; Italian airports; Malmquist; Business, Management and Accounting (all); Economics and Econometrics; Management Science and Operations Research; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Settore ING-IND/35 - INGEGNERIA ECONOMICO-GESTIONALE, DEA, Business
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 66 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
