
pmid: 19486976
Content validation theory and practice have received considerable attention in the nursing research literature. This paper positions the discourse within the broader scientific literature on validity of measurement. The content validity index has been recommended as a means to quantify content validity; this paper critically examines its origins, theoretical interpretations, and statistical properties. In addition, the author sets out to understand why many nurse researchers are occupied with content validity and its estimation. This investigation may be of interest to the scholar who desires to deeply understand the issues surrounding validity of measurement.
Nursing Research
Nursing Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 92 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
