
Abstract It is proved that the recently reported ‘ L -threonine phthalate’ (Theras et al. Optik. 127 (2016) 3397-3401) ‘ L -threonine phosphate’ (Chinnappan et al., Optik 126 (2015) 5517–5521) ‘ L -threonine formate’ (Hanumantharao and Kalainathan, Optik 124 (2013) 2204–2209) and ‘ L -threonine diformate’ (Viju et al., Optik 125 (2014) 5926–5928) are dubious crystals. Taking the title crystals as examples the importance of nomenclature of nonlinear optical crystals is highlighted.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
