
pmid: 17280665
To assess the ability of the risk of malignancy index (RMI) based on a serum CA125 level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, to discriminate benign from malignant adnexal masses.Between September 2002 and November 2004, 296 women with adnexal masses were enrolled. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of the CA125 serum level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in prediction of ovarian cancer were calculated and compared individually or combined into the RMI.The RMI identified malignant cases more accurately than any individual criterion in diagnosing ovarian cancer. Using a cut-off level of 153 to indicate malignancy, the RMI showed a sensitivity of 76.4%, a specificity of 77.9%, a PPV of 65.9%, a NPV of 85.5% with 79.4% correct diagnosis rate.The RMI is an appropriate method in diagnosing adnexal masses with high risk of malignancy and forwarding to gynecological oncology centers for suitable surgical operations.
Adult, Ovarian Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Postmenopause, Logistic Models, Adnexa Uteri, Premenopause, ROC Curve, Predictive Value of Tests, Adnexal Diseases, CA-125 Antigen, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Female, Ultrasonography
Adult, Ovarian Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnosis, Differential, Postmenopause, Logistic Models, Adnexa Uteri, Premenopause, ROC Curve, Predictive Value of Tests, Adnexal Diseases, CA-125 Antigen, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Female, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
