Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Cardiology
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Coronary calcium progression rates with a zero initial score by electron beam tomography

Authors: Ambarish, Gopal; Khurram, Nasir; Sandy T, Liu; Ferdinand R, Flores; Lynn, Chen; Matthew J, Budoff;

Coronary calcium progression rates with a zero initial score by electron beam tomography

Abstract

A review of existing literature shows that for individuals with initial coronary calcium scores (CCS) of zero it would be reasonable to consider follow-up scanning no sooner than 3 years from the initial evaluation, however the data is very limited. In this study, we sought to determine the rate of new calcifications in patients initially presenting with a zero initial score on electron beam tomography (EBT).We evaluated 710 physician-referred participants (253 women and 448 men, mean age=56+/-9 years [range=29 to 93]) with no coronary artery calcium (CAC) at baseline electron beam tomography (EBT) scan. The participants underwent a follow-up scan at least 12 months apart. In our study, 248 (35%) were followed for 1-3 years, 256 (36%) for 3-5 years and 204 (29%) for >5 years, respectively. Overall, more than half of the individuals (62%) did not develop any CAC (score remained zero) in the interim period, whereas only 2% had CAC progression >50 during the follow-up. The overall median (interquartile range) and mean+/-S.D. change/year in these individuals was 0 (0-0.8) and 1+/-3, respectively. Only 11 (2%) had CAC progression/year of 11-50, whereas 3 (1%) had CAC change/year >50. It is interesting to note that even among individuals with long-term follow-up (>5 years), very few individuals (2%) had CAC progression >50. Individuals with follow-up 3-5 years did not have a significantly higher odds ratio for CAC change >10 (p=0.17) as compared to the reference group (follow-up of 1-3 years). All the other individuals who had a longer follow-up (>5 years) had a significantly higher likelihood of CAC progression >10 (OR=6.6, 95% CI=2.6-16.9, p<0.0001) compared to the reference group.In individuals with no detectable coronary calcium on an initial EBT scan, a repeat scan can be recommended no sooner than 5 years.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Middle Aged, Coronary Vessels, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Disease Progression, Humans, Calcium, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    64
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
64
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!