Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Congre...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Congress Series
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Diagnostic Amsel criteria compared standardized method of Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis

Authors: Ziaeddine Moussavi; Roxana Behrouzi;

Diagnostic Amsel criteria compared standardized method of Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis

Abstract

Two well-described diagnostic methods for bacterial vaginosis are clinical or wet-smear diagnosis (Amsel criteria) and Gram stain diagnosis (Nugent criteria). Our objective was to compare diagnostic Amsel criteria and Gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Between June 1999 and November 2001, all non-pregnant women aged 16 years or older who referred to gynecologic clinic with a complaint of vaginal discharge were examined for detection of bacterial vaginosis by diagnostic methods of Amsel and Gram stain. Clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (Amsel criteria) was considered positive if at least three of the following four characteristics were seen: a homogenous appearance of the discharge, pH value >4.5, release of a fishy amine odor on addition of potassium hydroxide (Whiff test) and presence of clue cells. Amsel criteria were compared with Gram stain diagnosis. One hundred two patients were diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis. When compared Gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis as the standard method, Amsel criteria had sensitivity of 78% a specificity of 88% a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 58%. The utility of various single tests for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis as compared with the Gram stain showed lower diagnostic validity. Conclusion: Gram stain is a reproducible and reliable test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis and Amsel criteria must be confirm by Gram stain.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!