Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Congre...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Congress Series
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The effect of cotton roll biting on auditory evoked magnetic fields

Authors: Y Kobayashi; T Matsukubo; T Sato; H Nagasaka; N Sugihara; M Yumoto; T Ishikawa;

The effect of cotton roll biting on auditory evoked magnetic fields

Abstract

Abstract We have reported numerous clinical cases where a patient's unilateral chewing was thought to have reduced hearing ability. The purpose of this study is to determine whether occlusion and chewing function affect auditory evoked magnetic fields (AEFs). The subjects (seven males, 20–29) signed consent forms approved by the institutional ethical committee. A button sensor (FlexiForce™, Nitta) was used to monitor a subject's occlusal pressure. The subjects were instructed to maintain three ranges of their maximum occlusal pressure in each experiment. Subjects bit on cotton roll on the left or right first molar sites and were then stimulated with pure tone bursts (80 dB, 1000 Hz) from the left or right. The source localization was based on the signals recorded with the 36 planar gradiometers near both sides of the auditory area and the analysis was carried out based on the time-varying, multi-dipole model. The equipment used to monitor a subject's occlusal pressure did not recognize the noise affecting the AEF's measurement. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) measured at 20% or less than the maximum occlusal pressure, and between 20% and 40% of the maximum occlusal pressure confirmed existing in less than 1 mm by the MRI image as compared with control. This shows that the localization of ECDs exists in the auditory area at less than 40% of the maximum occlusal pressure. The AEF's response to a stimulus on the right shows a lower value compared with controls during cotton roll biting. Biting on cotton roll affected the AEF's response and the response was related to the strength of the occlusal force.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!