Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Gastrointestinal End...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Authors: Makoto, Higashimaya; Shiro, Oka; Shinji, Tanaka; Norifumi, Numata; Yoji, Sanomura; Shigeto, Yoshida; Koji, Arihiro; +1 Authors

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). 1-12 ESD involves circumferential mucosal incision and direct submucosal dissection, making it possible to resect en bloc even large tumors with endoscopically clear margins in any part of the stomach. The reported incomplete ESD resection rate is 7.4% to 26.3%, 1,2,13-19 and the reported local recurrence rate after ESD is 0% to 3%. 1,18-20 Incomplete resection leading to recurrent cancer in the stomach therefore continues to be problematic. Additional treatment is necessary in patients with incompletely resected lesions. We have reported ESD for residual/local recurrent EGC after EMR to be a safe, minimally invasive, effective procedure. 21 There are few published reports on the treatment of local recurrences of EGC after ESD, and it is difficult to carry out a second ESD because of scar formation resulting from the initial ESD. Between June 2005 and August 2012, we performed a second ESD in 12 patients with residual EGC lesions after having been treated with ESD, and we conducted a retrospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of this method of treatment.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Neoplasm, Residual, Dissection, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Gastric Mucosa, Stomach Neoplasms, Gastroscopy, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!