Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Geodermaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Geoderma
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Geoderma
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sources and fate of CO2 along the soil–aquifer–stream–atmosphere continuum (the Orgeval headwater catchment, France)

Authors: Josette Garnier; Sophie Guillon; Hocine Hénine; Gilles Billen; Nicolas Escoffier; Benjamin Mercier; Anun Martinez; +1 Authors

Sources and fate of CO2 along the soil–aquifer–stream–atmosphere continuum (the Orgeval headwater catchment, France)

Abstract

Few studies have examined CO2 sources and pathways along the soil–aquifer–stream–atmosphere continuum. We measured the water concentration of dissolved CO2, HCO3–, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), together with ancillary variables (pH, total alkalinity [TA], and major ions [Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42-, NO3–]), in piezometer transects and adjacent streams at a monthly interval over a 5-year period (2019–2023). Such a continuum was studied within a small catchment underlain by carbonate geology and subject to intensive agriculture.On the basis of the values of Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42-, and alkalinity in the upslope and downslope piezometers, we assumed that the more mineralized downslope water would characterize the slow groundwater flow component of the stream, while the less mineralized upslope water would reflect a fast sub-surface flow (surface runoff + agricultural drainage flow). These water flows components were calculated using the HYPE calibrated hydrological model.Accounting for weathering reactions and using a mass balance of dissolved C fluxes, we found that the total alkalinity flux (as HCO3–) reaching the river (amounting to 29 Mmol yr−1, i.e., 79 kgC ha−1 yr−1) derived for about one third from soil CO2 respiration, one third from carbonate dissolution induced by the reaction with CO2, and one third from carbonate dissolution induced by the acidity generated by nitrification of reduced N fertilizers.The groundwater CO2 fluxes to the stream (13 Mmol y-1, i.e., 36 kgC ha−1 yr−1) were 2 orders of magnitude lower than the total direct soil CO2 flux emitted to the atmosphere. Most (at least 95 %).of the groundwater CO2 fluxes was degassed once reaching the stream.Dissolved organic carbon flux to the stream represented only ∼ 2 % of the total dissolved carbon flux to the stream; the input of dissolved CO2 in rainfall to the soil–aquifer system amounted to less than 1 % of this total dissolved carbon flux to the stream.The carbonate weathering induced by soil respired CO2 amounted to ∼ 26 kgC ha−1 yr−1 in the Avenelles sub-catchment, representing ∼ 0.5 ‰ yr−1 of the total soil organic carbon stock. The alkalinity flux generated by this process might hence act as significant soil transient CO2 sink, depending on the prevalence of downstream processes affecting the stream carbonate buffering and speciation.

Keywords

Science, Q, Carbon pathways, CO2 concentrations and fluxes, Soil–water–atmosphere interface, Headwater streams

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold