<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 25444390
Social capital has been defined as the resources available to individuals and groups through membership in social networks. The definition is consistent with either an individualistic approach, i.e. resources (such as information or instrumental assistance) that are accessed by individuals through their network connections; or a collective approach, e.g. the benefits accruing to members of a group - such as the ability of a community to engage in collective action - as a consequence of the existence of cohesive relationships. While research often restricts itself to a single level of analysis, the benefits (and downsides) of social capital accrue to both the individual as well as to the network to which he belongs. In the Dictionary of Epidemiology both the individual and collective levels of analysis were recognized in the definition of social capital.
Capital social, 330, Health surveys, Epidemiology, Encuestas de salud, Trust, Social capital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Epidemiología, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Support, Models, Theoretical, Health Surveys, Interinstitutional Relations, Spain, Social Capital, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Capital social, 330, Health surveys, Epidemiology, Encuestas de salud, Trust, Social capital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Epidemiología, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Support, Models, Theoretical, Health Surveys, Interinstitutional Relations, Spain, Social Capital, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 140 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |