
arXiv: 2009.00952
Graph convolutional networks produce good predictions of unlabeled samples due to its transductive label propagation. Since samples have different predicted confidences, we take high-confidence predictions as pseudo labels to expand the label set so that more samples are selected for updating models. We propose a new training method named as mutual teaching, i.e., we train dual models and let them teach each other during each batch. First, each network feeds forward all samples and selects samples with high-confidence predictions. Second, each model is updated by samples selected by its peer network. We view the high-confidence predictions as useful knowledge, and the useful knowledge of one network teaches the peer network with model updating in each batch. In mutual teaching, the pseudo-label set of a network is from its peer network. Since we use the new strategy of network training, performance improves significantly. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance over state-of-the-art methods under very low label rates.
GCN, 8 pages, 1 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Statistics - Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
