
Abstract With the development of information technologies, various big data problems are emerging. The recommendation problem can be seen as a big data problem. Traditionally, for a recommender system (RS), only the recommendation precision is considered. However, reflecting another aspect of RS, recommendation diversity is also important. In this paper, we adopt a multiobjective recommendation model to simultaneously consider recommendation precision and diversity, specifically, precision, novelty and coverage of recommendation are involved. To tackle the multiobjective recommendation optimization problem (MROP), based on distributed parallel cooperative coevolutionary multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (DPCCMOEA), a novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), DPCCMOEA for RSs (DPCCMOEA-RecSys) is proposed. On the basis of cooperative coevolution (CC) framework, all users are allocated to several groups and are optimized simultaneously. Optimization strategy specific for RSs is put forward, the individual integration approach is explored and different grouping techniques are compared and analyzed. Compared to state-of-the-art cooperative coevolutionary MOEAs: cooperative coevolutionary generalized differential evolution 3 (CCGDE3), multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decision variable analyses (MOEA/DVA) and DPCCMOEA, DPCCMOEA-RecSys can achieve better optimization results; compared to serial algorithms: CCGDE3 and MOEA/DVA, DPCCMOEA and DPCCMOEA-RecSys significantly reduce the time consumption.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
