Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Fertility and Steril...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Fertility and Sterility
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier Non-Commercial
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Translocation chromosome karyotypes of the Robertsonian translocation carriers' embryos

Authors: Huang, Jin; Liu, Ping; Qiao, Jie; Lian, Ying; Chen, Yongjian;

Translocation chromosome karyotypes of the Robertsonian translocation carriers' embryos

Abstract

To explore the translocation karyotypes of the Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers' embryos in their preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles.Retrospective.University-affiliated IVF center.A total of 35 RT carrier couples underwent 39 blastomere PGD cycles from August 2005 to June 2008.The PGD analysis of embryos.Meiotic segregation patterns of the 253 embryos were analyzed in their PGD cycles.The alternate embryos were approximately one third of all the embryos (82 of 253, 32.41%). The ratio among the alternate embryos, the adjacent-1 embryos and the adjacent-2 embryos was 2:1:1. There was no significant difference between the male RT subgroup and the female RT subgroup (31.43% vs. 37.21%) regarding the proportion of the alternate embryos and no significant difference was found between the common RT subgroup and the rare RT subgroup (33.48% vs. 25.00%). In contrast, the alternate embryo percentage in the pregnancy subgroup was much higher than that of the pregnancy failure subgroup (45.16% vs. 28.27%).The alternate embryos are dominant among the RT carriers' embryos and different gender and different translocation chromosomes have no effect on the alternate embryos rate. The ratio among the alternate embryos, the adjacent-1 embryos and the adjacent-2 embryos is 2:1:1.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Genetic Carrier Screening, Embryo, Mammalian, Chromosomes, Translocation, Genetic, Embryo Culture Techniques, Pregnancy, Karyotyping, Humans, Female, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!