Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao EXPLOREarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
EXPLORE
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1093/med/97...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/97...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

The Antioxidant Debate

Authors: Elena, Ladas; Kara M, Kelly;

The Antioxidant Debate

Abstract

Abstract Patients with cancer are taking antioxidant supplements in combination with conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy to enhance the anticancer activity and to reduce the side effects of conventional treatment. Many oncologists are concerned that the protective mechanisms of antioxidants may not distinguish between normal and malignant cells, so that supplements may interfere with the anticancer activity of the conventional therapies. Not all antioxidant supplements are equivalent; antioxidants counteract free radical activity through multiple mechanisms of action.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Contraindications, Neoplasms, Dietary Supplements, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Dissent and Disputes, Antioxidants

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!