
Studies on mice and rats have demonstrated that calorie restriction (CR) slows primary aging, has a protective effect against secondary aging, and markedly decreases the incidence of malignancies. However, the only way to determine whether CR "works" in humans is to conduct studies on people. Such studies are difficult to perform in free-living people. While research on CR in humans is still at an early stage, a modest amount of information has accumulated. Because it is not feasible to conduct studies of the effects of CR on longevity in humans, surrogate measures have to be used. Preliminary information obtained using this approach provides evidence that CR provides a powerful protective effect against secondary aging in humans. This evidence consists of the finding that risk factors for atherosclerosis and diabetes are markedly reduced in humans on CR. Humans on CR also show some of the same adaptations that are thought to be involved in slowing primary aging in rats and mice. These include a very low level of inflammation as evidenced by low circulating levels of c-reactive protein and TNFalpha, serum triiodothyronine levels at the low end of the normal range, and a more elastic "younger" left ventricle (LV), as evaluated by echo-doppler measures of LV stiffness.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Inflammation, Male, Aging, Clinical Trials as Topic, Longevity, Middle Aged, Atherosclerosis, Macaca mulatta, Ventricular Function, Left, Rats, Mice, Diabetes Mellitus, Animals, Humans, Female, Aged, Caloric Restriction
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Inflammation, Male, Aging, Clinical Trials as Topic, Longevity, Middle Aged, Atherosclerosis, Macaca mulatta, Ventricular Function, Left, Rats, Mice, Diabetes Mellitus, Animals, Humans, Female, Aged, Caloric Restriction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 278 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
