Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Urology Sup...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Urology Supplements
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Retroperitoneoscopy: A Versatile Access for Many Urologic Indications

Authors: Dogu Teber; Ahmet Tefekli; Saadettin Eskicorapci; Ali S. Gözem; Svetlana Bujosevic; Marto Sugiono; Christian Stock; +1 Authors

Retroperitoneoscopy: A Versatile Access for Many Urologic Indications

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Current indications of retroperitoneoscopy have been extended to oncologic operations (radical nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection) and complex reconstructive procedures (pyeloplasty, partial nephrectomy). Our single-institution experience focuses on feasibility and complications of retroperitoneoscopy performed over 9 yr. Methods Between 1997 and 2006, 6 staff surgeons and 10 fellows at our institution performed 692 retroperitoneal procedures. Using this technique, 17 different procedures were performed. These operations were classified according to their technical difficulty and operative risk. Intraoperative major complications were analysed and postoperative complications were stratified into five grades using the modified Clavien classification system. Results Procedures were classified as simple in 76 patients (10.9%), difficult in 471 (68%), and very difficult in 145 (20.9%). The mean operation time was 145.2±89.7min (range: 30–270min). Intraoperative major complications, including open conversion in 1.4%, were observed in a total of 15 patients (2.2%). A total of 76 patients (10.9%) patients had postoperative complications: grade I in 12 (1.7%), grade II in 51 (7.3%), grade IIIa in 2 (0.2%), grade IIIb in 10 (1.4%), and grade IV in 1 (0.1%). Major intraoperative and postoperative complication rates depended on the difficulty of the procedure but diminished over the years with increased experience of the surgeons. Conclusions Retroperitoneoscopy has proven to be an excellent approach with certain advantages (early control of renal hilum, minimal risk of abdominal complications, and feasibility in cases of previous abdominal surgery). It represents a well-standardised and transferable procedure on kidney, adrenal, ureter, and lymphatics.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!