
handle: 1721.1/107418
Water distribution systems (WDS) are complex pipe networks with looped and branching topologies that often comprise thousands to tens of thousands of links and nodes. This work presents a generic framework for improved analysis and management of WDS by partitioning the system into smaller (almost) independent sub-systems with balanced loads and minimal number of interconnections. This paper compares the performance of three classes of unsupervised learning algorithms from graph theory for practical sub-zoning of WDS: (1) Global clustering - a bottom-up algorithm for clustering n objects with respect to a similarity function, (2) Community structure - a bottom-up algorithm based on the property of network modularity, which is a measure of the quality of network partition to clusters versus randomly generated graph with respect to the same nodal degree, and (3) Graph partitioning - a flat partitioning algorithm for dividing a network with n nodes into k clusters, such that the total weight of edges crossing between clusters is minimized and the loads of all the clusters are balanced. The algorithms are adapted to WDS to provide a practical decision support tool for water utilities. Visual qualitative and quantitative measures are proposed to evaluate models' performance. The three methods are applied for two large-scale water distribution systems serving heavily populated areas in Singapore. Display Omitted We apply three classes of unsupervised learning algorithms for WDS partition.Visual and quantitative metrics are used for performance evaluation and comparison.We provide a practical decision support tool for water utilities.Results show superiority of the community structure and graph partitioning methods.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
