
Abstract This paper presents the analytical models to predict the reverse arch action (RAA) and the compressive arch action (CAA) of unbonded prestressed reinforced concrete (UPRC) beam-column sub-assemblages under column removal scenarios. In the models, the realistic stress–strain model for concrete is applied to calculate the compression force sustained by concrete, instead of the equivalent rectangular concrete stress block. A linear variation of the strains for concrete and steel reinforcement along the beam length is assumed. Moreover, a notional eccentricity of eccentric force imposing on beam section is introduced in the RAA model to determine its bending moment. Comparisons between FEM’s and analytical results indicate that reasonable accuracy can be obtained in predicting not only the inverted camber and the RAA capacity of the sub-assemblages by the RAA model, but also the CAA capacity and the horizontal reaction force through the CAA model. Furthermore, the effects of effective prestress on the CAA of the sub-assemblages are investigated. Finally, through a contrastive analysis, it can be concluded that the increase of effective prestress is beneficial to the enhancement of CAA capacity to mitigate structural progressive collapse but worse to the ductility of beam section.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
