Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Engineering Structur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Engineering Structures
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Steel beam strengthening with UHM CFRP strip panels

Authors: A. Peiris; I. Harik;

Steel beam strengthening with UHM CFRP strip panels

Abstract

Abstract Strengthening of steel beams utilizing FRP material has numerous advantages over traditional methods, which include bolting or welding new steel plates to the existing structure. Compared to other FRP material, Carbon FRPs (CFRPs) have been preferred for strengthening steel due to their higher stiffness. The emergence of High Modulus (HM) and Ultra-High Modulus (UHM) CFRP laminates, with an elastic modulus higher than that of steel, enables an increase in load transfer in steel beams prior to yielding of steel. Earlier research has highlighted the premature debonding failure of splice plates when used with UHM CFRP laminates. As an alternative to using a splice plate/laminate, this study investigates the performance of CFRP strip panels. The panels are designed so that continuity between two consecutive panels can be achieved through a finger joint. The panels are fabricated using narrow UHM CFRP strips (e.g., 5 mm, 10 mm) mounted on a fabric mesh, which is designed to maintain the necessary clear spacing between individual strips. Flexural tests are carried out under 4-point bending on steel wide flange beams. A 50 mm wide UHM CFRP laminate strengthened beam without laminate splicing is compared with the novel strip panel type splice strengthened girders. Two different strip widths of 5 mm and 10 mm are tested and all beams, strengthened with the same CFRP area, are evaluated against an un-strengthened control steel beam. The failure of the steel beam strengthened with the 50 mm UHM CFRP laminate was due to laminate rupture at a failure load (PFU-50mm) that is 39% larger than the load at which yielding initiated (Py) in the un-strengthened control beam (PFU-50mm = 1.39 Py). The tensile strains observed during rupture were 30% higher than the average maximum tensile strain observed in the material tests. The beams strengthened with UHM CFRP strip panels failed in debonding at the finger joint, with failure loads that are 27% and 26% larger than Py for the 10 mm and 5 mm strip panels respectively (PFU-10mm = 1.27 Py, PFU-5mm = 1.26 Py).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!