
handle: 10092/100659
Abstract The structural performance of nailed hold-down connection systems used for cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls under monotonic and cyclic loading was experimentally evaluated. Critical connection performance parameters, including strength, stiffness, ductility, and overstrength, were derived from the testing of 68 hold-down connection specimens. The nailed CLT hold-down connections achieved moderate to high ductility when fracture failures of their metal brackets were avoided. The hold-down connection systems with 3 mm thick commercial brackets achieved ductility factors ranged from 2.7 to 4.3, while the hold-down connection systems composed of 10 mm thick steel plates and longer nails achieved larger ductility factors which ranged from 4.7 to 6.3. The overstrength factors of the hold-down systems ranged from 1.45 to 1.62 except the one composed of the 10 mm thick brackets and 100 mm long nails installed at wide spacing. It was also found that the yield strength of the nailed hold-down connections under monotonic loading was similar to that obtained by cyclic loading.
690, overstrength, 2205 Civil and Structural Engineering, nailed connections, Cross-laminated timber (CLT), Nailed connections, cross-laminated timber (CLT), ductility, hold-down connections, Hold-down connections, Overstrength, Ductility, Fields of Research::40 - Engineering::4005 - Civil engineering::400506 - Earthquake engineering
690, overstrength, 2205 Civil and Structural Engineering, nailed connections, Cross-laminated timber (CLT), Nailed connections, cross-laminated timber (CLT), ductility, hold-down connections, Hold-down connections, Overstrength, Ductility, Fields of Research::40 - Engineering::4005 - Civil engineering::400506 - Earthquake engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
