
Abstract This paper describes a study on the compressive arch action of reinforced concrete beams with various levels of horizontal restraints. An analytical model is proposed based on Park’s assumption, in which the tension-stiffening effect of steel reinforcement and its slip relative to beam-column joints are considered. The model is calibrated by experimental results of beam-column sub-assemblages and frames subject to column removal scenarios. The model is calibrated by experimental results of beam-column sub-assemblages and frames subjected to middle column removal scenarios. A parametric study is conducted to shed light on the effects of horizontal restraints on the axial compression force of beams and the strain of compressive reinforcement. Analytical results suggest that the compressive reinforcement may not yield under compressive arch action, and its strain varies with the axial compression force in the beam. To develop a simplified design method, the relationship between the axial compression force and the strain of compressive reinforcement is established through the theoretical axial force-bending moment interaction diagram. An explicit expression for axial compressive strain is derived from force equilibrium and compatibility and incorporated in the design method to evaluate the compressive arch action capacity and associated axial compression force of reinforced concrete beams. Comparisons with existing experimental results in the available literature and other models suggest that the design method yields reasonably accurate estimations of critical parameters related to compressive arch action.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
