
Abstract To ensure ductile behavior of light frame timber wall elements in the context of capacity design it is indispensable to design non-ductile parts and connections with considerable overstrength. The determination of overstrength values based on reliability methods enables to address different target failure probabilities. A two-step procedure is proposed. First a sensitivity analysis is carried out on 972 wall configurations. Within the configuration the nail diameter, the nail spacing, the sheathing material, the thickness of the sheathing, the arrangement of the sheathing, the length of the wall elements and the vertical load is varied to assess the influence of the varied parameters. Within the sensitivity analysis the overstrength values that ensure the target failure probability P f = 0.04 within the range of P f = 0.023 to P f = 0.067 are determined using first-order reliability methods. The sensitivity analysis shows that the determination of overstrength values for different parameter configurations seems not to be necessary. For the second step the wall configurations that lead to the greatest overstrength values according to first-order reliability methods are identified. For these wall configurations the failure probability is determined using Monte-Carlo-Methods. The failure probability is determined using overstrength values within the range of γ R d = 1.0 to γ R d = 2.6 and minimum dimensions for the main load carrying parts of a timber frame wall element. The overstrength values that leads to an exact failure probability of P f = 0.067 for the wall configurations are determined. The overstrength values determined on the selected wall configurations are used to calculate the failure probability for all 972 wall configurations using Monte-Carlo-Methods. Finally, overstrength values are proposed to achieve ductile failure for all considered wall configurations for a certain level of probability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
