
Abstract An experimental study on 18 simply supported ferrocement plates having a span/depth ratio of 2.0 was conducted. Various wire mesh types were used as web reinforcement. Flexural steel was designed to preclude failure in modes other than flexure. Two groups, A and B, were tested under central uniform loads covering 10% and 67.5% of the clear span respectively. It was observed that, the percentage increase of shear capacity over the reference specimen is remarkable for group A and nearly equal to 40%. Moreover, a hexagonal mesh, V f of 0.15%, improves the shear capacity than those of diamond and square meshes of 0.25% and 0.38% volume fraction respectively. Specimens of group B demonstrate a slight increase of the ultimate shear capacity than those of group A despite that the web reinforcement is less effective as pointed out by comparing the results of each group with its associated reference specimen. A good agreement between the classical shear equations prediction and the experimental values is obtained for group A specimens whereas the ultimate shear capacity for group B is underestimated. It is also indicated that the strut and tie model is an inappropriate technique for the ferrocement plate design compared to the classical shear equations of deep beams.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
