
Abstract The seismic design of structures located close to active faults must account for the special characteristics of ground motions in the near-fault region, in particular when these motions contain forward directivity (FD) effects. FD effects result in short duration motions with intense velocity pulses. In this study, the response of nonlinear-single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems to FD motions is characterized by ductility and period-dependent strength reduction factors. This study compares reduction factors from two near-fault data sets, one containing 82 pulse-type motions with FD effects and the other containing 63 motions without FD effects. A statistical analysis was performed to determine if differences between reduction factors for the two sets were statistically significant. Results show that reduction factors for FD and non-FD near-fault motions are different, particularly in the range of periods of FD pulses ( T = 0.5 to 3 s). Strength reduction factors for FD motions were shown to be dependent on earthquake magnitude and, to a lesser degree, site conditions. This magnitude dependence was not observed in non-FD motions. These conclusions indicate that common design specifications based on non-pulse ground motions cannot be directly applied to pulse-type, FD motions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
