
Current codes for earthquake resistant design of RC structures include several provisions that ensure satisfactory behaviour of columns. In order to check the efficiency of relevant code provisions, the behaviour exhibited by tested RC columns is assessed. For this purpose, experimental results on more than 450 RC columns were collected. Their behaviour has been evaluated on the basis of several parameters, namely: the in-section arrangement of hoops, the effective confinement ratio, the spacing of hoops normalized to the longitudinal bar diameter, etc. The main findings of this comparison between experimental results and code provisions are presented in this paper. The present work confirms the beneficial role of multiple hoops, low axial load, high confinement ratios and low values of the spacing of hoops normalized to the diameter of longitudinal bars on limiting the force response degradation due to cycling, as well as on enhancing the ductility of RC columns. In general, code provisions seem to ensure the targeted behaviour.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
