Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Enfermería Clínicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Enfermería Clínica
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Incidencia y factores relacionados con la pérdida hemática intraparto excesiva

Authors: Ana Isabel Romero-Arias; María Luján-Prior; Jonathan Pernia-Fernández; Antonio Hernández-Martínez;

Incidencia y factores relacionados con la pérdida hemática intraparto excesiva

Abstract

Resumen Introduccion El alumbramiento y el posparto inmediato suponen un riesgo potencial importante para la mujer, siendo la hemorragia una de las principales causas de morbimortalidad. Se considera un sangrado excesivo el descenso de ≥3,5 g de hemoglobina durante el proceso del parto, presentandose como un indicador de calidad asistencial en el parto. Objetivo Determinar la incidencia y los factores relacionados con la perdida hematica intraparto excesiva. Personas y metodo Diseno hibrido de casos y controles anidados en una cohorte de 1.488 gestantes que dieron a luz en el Complejo Hospitalario Mancha-Centro durante el ano 2008. Se seleccionaron la totalidad de los casos (84 sujetos con una perdida ≥3,5 g hemoglobina) y el doble de controles (164) emparejados por momento de parto. Se realizo un analisis multivariante por medio de regresion logistica condicional. Resultados La incidencia de sangrado excesivo intraparto se situo en el 6,6%, no se observan diferencias con respecto a la via del parto (vaginal = 6,8% y cesarea = 5,6%). La anemia anteparto se situo en torno a un 10% y la anemia posparto en un 41,4%. No encontramos factores relacionados con el sangrado en los partos cesarea. Sin embargo, en los vaginales la primiparidad, el alumbramiento manual y especialmente la practica de la episiotomia [O.R.= 4,82 (IC: 95% 1,73-13,44] se presentan como claros factores de riesgo. Conclusion La incidencia de sangrado excesivo se situa por encima de los niveles recomendados. La primiparidad, el alumbramiento manual y especialmente la realizacion de episiotomia son factores de riesgo de sangrado.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!