
pmid: 16877130
This article examines the role and impact of EMTALA on the ethical delivery of hospital-based emergency services, primarily through close inspection of three of the core EMTALA mandates: the medical screening examination, the duty to accept patients in transfer from less capable facilities, and the requirement that the hospital provide on-call physician services to the emergency department to help stabilize patients with emergencies or help accept patients in transfer. Hospital and physician responses to these mandates, such as triaging/screening patients away from the emergency department, avoiding the application of EMTALA, refusing to accept inpatients with emergencies in transfer, and devising ways to avoid on-call duties, are analyzed in some detail.
Patient Transfer, Human Rights, Physicians, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Patient Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, United States
Patient Transfer, Human Rights, Physicians, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Patient Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
