
pmid: 16928453
To determine the impact of secondary procedures performed to maintain arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) patency.There hundred and eighty six vascular access procedures were retrospectively evaluated. 156 (40.4%) patients required radiological interventions to treat acute thrombosis, swelling of the extremity with the access site, insufficient hemodialysis, or stenosis at an anastomotic site.The 386 cases comprised 106 AVGs and 280 AVFs. In 138 of the 156 cases, which required a radiological intervention, the treatment was successful and saved the vascular access site. The unassisted post-intervention patency time for these 138 successful cases was 13.1 +/- 12 months (range, 1-65 months). Twenty-nine (63%) of the 46 access sites treated with surgical thrombectomy were saved.Frequent, regular follow-up of hemodialysis patients with vascular access sites is the best way to diagnose problems early and allow the best chance of long-term function.
Adult, Male, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Radiography, Interventional, Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Renal Dialysis, Therapeutic thrombolysis, Humans, Thrombolytic Therapy, Arteriovenous fistula, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Thrombectomy, Medicine(all), Aged, 80 and over, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Phlebography, Middle Aged, Hemodialysis, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female, Stents, Angioplasty, Balloon, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Radiography, Interventional, Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Renal Dialysis, Therapeutic thrombolysis, Humans, Thrombolytic Therapy, Arteriovenous fistula, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Thrombectomy, Medicine(all), Aged, 80 and over, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Phlebography, Middle Aged, Hemodialysis, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Female, Stents, Angioplasty, Balloon, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
