
pmid: 17768027
Cervical carcinoma remains an important health problem in both developed and developing countries even though population-based screening programs are widely available. The classical surgical management of early-stage cervical carcinoma, known as radical hysterectomy (RH), was first described by Wertheim more than one hundred years ago and was then modified and re-popularized by Meigs in 1950s. The surgical principles of this operation have undergone only minor modifications and remain the basis for the surgical approach utilized by gynecologic oncologists today. However, some recent studies have questioned the role of RH due to a high rate of postoperative complications involving the pelvic autonomic nerve system and poor oncological outcomes despite postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation. During the last 2 decades, new surgical operations (radical vaginal trachelectomy, nerve-sparing hysterectomy, total mesometrial resection, laterally extended endopelvic resection, laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic lumbo-aortic lymph node dissection, and laparoscopic pelvic exenteration) have been proposed for the management of both early- and late-stage cervical carcinoma. In this manuscript, some technical details and oncological outcomes of these new surgical approaches are summarized.
Treatment Outcome, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Hysterectomy, Neoplasm Staging
Treatment Outcome, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Hysterectomy, Neoplasm Staging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
