
pmid: 16630703
To clarify the requirements for Food and Drug Administration approval in the United States for hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration. Also, to review the status of the approval process in Europe.The obstacles to be overcome for approval by the Food and Drug Administration for a new drug approval and for a new device approval were reviewed. Drugs approved in the past were examined for their potential for current application in this technology.The likelihood that the approval of a heater circulator along with the approval for specific chemotherapy agents for heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was judged to be remote. Rather, the continued use of "homemade heater circulators" and the off-label use of appropriate chemotherapy agents augmented by heat will continue to be the standard of care. The European community currently has several heater circulators approved for hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration. These devices have been specifically approved for oncologic indications.Continued research and development of heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is necessary. As the requirement for prevention and treatment of the peritoneal surface component of gastrointestinal and gynecologic oncology expands, new investigations into the approval process in the United States will be necessary. Publication of results from institutions pioneering these new treatment strategies will, of necessity, continue.
Europe, United States Food and Drug Administration, Device Approval, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Infusions, Parenteral, Hyperthermia, Induced, Drug Approval, Peritoneal Neoplasms, United States
Europe, United States Food and Drug Administration, Device Approval, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Infusions, Parenteral, Hyperthermia, Induced, Drug Approval, Peritoneal Neoplasms, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
