
pmid: 21596504
Computed tomography (CT) exams contribute for a large part to the population's radiation burden. This study addresses the question if dose settings of scanners expressed by dose-length product (DLP) are correlated with directly measurable biological effects in patients.DLP, blood dose, effective dose and DNA damage were analyzed for patients undergoing a thoracic or abdominal contrast CT scan on two CT scanners with different dose settings. The DNA damage was assessed by scoring γ-H2AX foci representing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in patient's lymphocytes. Blood dose was calculated using the ImPACT software.The CT system operating at higher dose settings represented by higher DLP values, resulted in a significantly higher number of radiation-induced γ-H2AX foci in patient's lymphocytes (DLP: 2.1 times higher; γ-H2AX foci: 2.3 times higher; p<0.05). Plotting γ-H2AX foci versus blood dose showed a systematic increase of DNA damage with dose. In vitro experiments ruled out a possible X-ray enhancement of DNA damage effect by contrast agent.Present study demonstrates that optimization of DLP setting of scanners results in a reduction of X-ray effects in patients.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Adolescent, Contrast Media, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Middle Aged, Statistics, Nonparametric, Histones, Humans, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Female, Lymphocytes, Software, Aged, DNA Damage
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Chi-Square Distribution, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Adolescent, Contrast Media, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Middle Aged, Statistics, Nonparametric, Histones, Humans, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Female, Lymphocytes, Software, Aged, DNA Damage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
