
pmid: 22085681
Patients with severe constipation are treated with combinations of several different laxatives. The purpose of this study is to examine whether the concomitant use of different laxatives enhances the laxative effect, using an osmotic laxative, magnesium sulphate (MgSO₄), and a stimulant laxative, bisacodyl. The faecal water content of rats, to which MgSO₄ and bisacodyl were coadministered, was lower than that in the MgSO₄ group, while the change in the faecal water content over time was very similar to that in the bisacodyl group. The mRNA expression of the osmotic pressure marker, sodium/myo-inositol transporter, in the coadministration group 5h after the administration was significantly higher than that in the control group and almost equal to that in the MgSO₄ group. The protein expression level of aquaporin-3 (AQP3), which plays an important role in water transfer, in the coadministration group decreased compared to the control group, as was the case in the bisacodyl group. The results of this study indicates that the coadministration of MgSO₄ and bisacodyl does not enhance the laxative effect because the expression level of AQP3 in the colon in the coadministration group was almost equal to that in the bisacodyl group.
Bisacodyl, Male, Aquaporin 3, Symporters, Cathartics, Colon, Water, Severity of Illness Index, Rats, Feces, Magnesium Sulfate, Gene Expression Regulation, Laxatives, Osmotic Pressure, Animals, Drug Therapy, Combination, RNA, Messenger, Intestinal Mucosa, Rats, Wistar, Constipation
Bisacodyl, Male, Aquaporin 3, Symporters, Cathartics, Colon, Water, Severity of Illness Index, Rats, Feces, Magnesium Sulfate, Gene Expression Regulation, Laxatives, Osmotic Pressure, Animals, Drug Therapy, Combination, RNA, Messenger, Intestinal Mucosa, Rats, Wistar, Constipation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
