
pmid: 18694823
It is of crucial importance to determine the concentration of the different components in the formulation accurately, during production. In this respect, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy represents an intriguing alternative that offers rapid, non-invasive and non-destructive sample analysis. This method, combined with multivariate data analysis was successfully applied to quantify the total concentration of lipids in the liposomal CAF01 adjuvant, composed of the cationic surfactant dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) and the immunomodulator alpha,alpha'-trehalose 6,6'-dibehenate (TDB). The near-infrared (NIR) detection method was compared to a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method and a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis, and a blinded study with three different sample concentrations was performed, showing that there was no significant difference in the accuracy of the three methods. However, the NIR and DSC methods were more precise than the HPLC method. Also, with the NIR method it was possible to differentiate between various concentrations of trehalose added as cryo-/lyoprotector. These studies therefore suggest that NIR can be used for real-time process control analysis in the production of CAF01 liposomes.
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Reproducibility of Results, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Cryoprotective Agents, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Liposomes, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Glycolipids, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Reproducibility of Results, Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Cryoprotective Agents, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Liposomes, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Glycolipids, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
