Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Physica Medicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Physica Medica
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

O37. Radiobiological evaluation of prostate 3D-CRT using the Pinnacle3 TPS

Authors: H. Fourie; H. Burger;

O37. Radiobiological evaluation of prostate 3D-CRT using the Pinnacle3 TPS

Abstract

Introduction Superior tumour control of high risk prostate cancer requires doses in excess of 70 Gy, but is limited by the normal tissue constraints. Additionally, increasing evidence suggests prostate cancer has an α / β value closer to that of late responding tissues or even lower. Conventionally, physiological dose distributions and DVH statistics are used for plan evaluation. This study investigates plan evaluations through radiobiological modelling of Tumour Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) and their sensitivity to fractionation schedules. Materials and methods A departmental investigation was done using 10 random 3D conformal external photon beam prostate radiotherapy plans. The effects of dose escalation, dose per fraction, and tumour radiosensitivity to fractionation ( α / β ) on prostate TCP and rectal NTCP were investigated using the commercial Pinnacle3 (v. 9.8) treatment planning system’s Biological Plan Evaluation module. Results As expected, an increase in TCP and NTCP was observed when increasing the total prescribed dose; additionally, the rectal NTCP was found to be correlated to the volume of rectum irradiated. TCPs remained relatively constant w.r.t. α / β values for conventional dose/fraction regimes, but increased with higher doses/fraction, especially at lower α / β values. For example, for two typical fractionation regimes (2 Gy x 37 fractions (SFRT) vs. 2.5 Gy × 28 fractions (HFRT)) the Pinnacle model was used to predict NTCP ( α / β = 3) and TCP for α / β = 10 & 3 respectively. The TCP was relatively insensitive to the α / β changes for the SFRT regime (93.1% & 92.8%), whereas the HFRT regime showed a larger percentage change (91.2% & 96.0%). The NTCPs were 6.4% and 8.5% for the respective fractionation schedules regardless of tumour α / β . Conclusion If the α / β value for prostate cancer is lower than that of late responding normal tissues, radiobiological evaluations suggest that the tumour would be more sensitive to changes in the dose/fraction and a higher TCP could be obtained without a significant increase in rectal NTCP; this is exploited through hypofractionation.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!