
pmid: 21803627
X-knife and gamma knife techniques are well-established for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Due to differences in their radiation delivery methods, some of the dosimetric parameters of these two techniques differ which may have clinical significance. There are many dosimetric studies comparing linear accelerator based techniques such as X-knife with gamma knife but generally from different institutions. We carried out a retrospective comparative study of the dosimetric parameters of the SRS treatments performed at our centre with X-knife (circular cones) and gamma knife. Our results indicate that the dose conformity and dose fall-off in the vicinity of the target volumes were better for patients treated with gamma knife as compared to X-knife. However, the dose fall-off pattern shows a reversal at a larger distance from the target. It was better for the X-knife as compared to gamma knife in the low dose region.
Neoplasms, Humans, X-Ray Therapy, Radiometry, Radiosurgery
Neoplasms, Humans, X-Ray Therapy, Radiometry, Radiosurgery
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
