Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Cancer
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases

Authors: Omar, Dawood; Anand, Mahadevan; Karyn A, Goodman;

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases

Abstract

Although resection is the standard of care for liver metastasis, 80-90% of patients are not resectable at diagnosis. Advances in combination chemotherapy, particularly with targeted agents, have increased tumour response and survival in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, but these techniques have limitations and may be associated with high recurrence rates. Some autopsy series have shown that as many as 40% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have disease confined to the liver; aggressive local therapy may improve overall survival in such patients. Local control of liver metastases can also ease hepatic capsular pain to improve quality of life. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers an alternative, non-invasive approach to the treatment of liver metastasis through precisely targeted delivery of radiation to the tumours while minimising normal tissue toxicity. Early applications of SBRT to liver metastases have been promising with the reports of 2-year local control rates of 71-86% and other studies reporting 18-month local control rates of 71-93%. While these data establish the safety of SBRT for liver metastases, more rigorous phase II clinical studies are needed to fully evaluate long-term efficacy and toxicity results. In the interim, this review stresses that SBRT of liver must be performed cautiously given the challenges of organ motion and the low toxicity tolerance of the surrounding hepatic parenchyma.

Keywords

Motion, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Respiration, Liver Neoplasms, Humans, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Radiometry, Radiosurgery

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    105
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
105
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!