
Oropharyngeal candidiasis is a frequent infection in cancer patients who receive cytotoxic drugs. In this study, the efficacy, safety and tolerance of fluconazole and itraconazole were compared in non-neutropenic cancer patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Of 279 patients who were randomised between the two treatment groups, 252 patients were considered to be eligible (126 in each group). The clinical cure rate was 74% for fluconazole and 62% for itraconazole (P=0.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.5-23.3%). The mycological cure rate was 80% for fluconazole and 68% for itraconazole (P=0.03, 95% CI: 1.2-22.6%). The safety and tolerance profile of both drugs were comparable. This study has shown that in patients with cancer and oropharyngeal candidiasis, fluconazole has a significantly better clinical and mycological cure rate compared with itraconazole.
Adult, Male, Antifungal Agents, Adolescent, Candida glabrata, Middle Aged, Immunocompromised Host, EBP 3: Effective Primary Care and Public Health, UMCN 1.5: Interventional oncology, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Candidiasis, Oral, Neoplasms, Candida albicans, Humans, UMCN 4.1: Microbial pathogenesis and host defense, Female, Itraconazole, Fluconazole, Aged
Adult, Male, Antifungal Agents, Adolescent, Candida glabrata, Middle Aged, Immunocompromised Host, EBP 3: Effective Primary Care and Public Health, UMCN 1.5: Interventional oncology, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Candidiasis, Oral, Neoplasms, Candida albicans, Humans, UMCN 4.1: Microbial pathogenesis and host defense, Female, Itraconazole, Fluconazole, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
