Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Detection of cervical precancer and cancer in a hospital population

Authors: Pretet, Jean-Luc; Dalstein, V.; Riethmuller, D.; Sautière, J.L.; Pretet, J.L.; Kantelip, B.; Schaal, J.P.; +1 Authors

Detection of cervical precancer and cancer in a hospital population

Abstract

The aim was to determine the relevance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in identifying high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2/3+) in a hospital population (n=3574) characterised by a high rate of cytological abnormalities and high-risk HPV infections. According to the results of the initial Papanicolaou and HPV test, women were directly referred for colposcopy/biopsy or recalled for a control visit. Sensitivity and specificity were corrected for verification bias. HPV-testing sensitivity was 94.3%, higher than that of cytological testing at any cut-off point (65.1%-86.8%), while specificity was greater for cytology than for HPV testing (99.3% or 91.8% versus 83.4%). The combination of both tests allowed 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. We conclude that HPV testing is a relevant tool for the detection of cervical disease. The best way of combining cytology and HPV detection in screening programmes should be evaluated in large-scale studies.

Country
France
Keywords

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, MESH: Hospitalization, MESH: Papillomavirus Infections, MESH: Papillomaviridae, 80 and over, Mass Screening, Viral, Papillomaviridae, MESH: Aged, Aged, 80 and over, MESH: Middle Aged, MESH: DNA, MESH: Follow-Up Studies, Middle Aged, MESH: Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Hospitalization, MESH: Precancerous Conditions, Colposcopy, MESH: Colposcopy, Female, Papanicolaou Test, Adult, MESH: Vaginal Smears, Adolescent, 610, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, MESH: Papanicolaou Test, Sensitivity and Specificity, 618, [SDV.CAN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, Humans, MESH: Mass Screening, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Aged, MESH: Adolescent, Vaginal Smears, MESH: Humans, Papillomavirus Infections, MESH: Tumor Virus Infections, MESH: Adult, MESH: Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Virus Infections, DNA, Viral, MESH: Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, MESH: Female, Precancerous Conditions, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    39
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
39
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!