
handle: 10486/691653 , 20.500.12010/13288
Apart from its enormous health and economic impact, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way of practicing medicine and medical education. It is likely that this effect may accelerate the transformation that both activities are experiencing. The present article, written at the peak of the crisis, sets out some thoughts on four topics: 1) the publication of false and sensationalist news; 2) the risks of taking medical decisions not based on the evidence; 3) the bioethical implications when there are sufficient resources available for everybody and; 4) the possible effects of the crisis on the teaching of medicine. This crisis should enable doctors, teachers and, students of medicine to draw conclusions and be better prepared for the future. Firstly, it is essential to maintain critical thinking that may protect against the ‘infodemic’. Furthermore, the scientific and ethical standards learned in the faculty, should not be forgotten. Lastly, it should be remembered that, in a devastating pandemic like the current one, apart from scientific medicine, which is practised with the brain, the other medicine that is practiced with the heart must also be practised.
Medicine (General), Fairness, SARS-CoV-2, Medicina, Research, COVID-19, Ensayos clínicos, Education (General), General Medicine, Telemedicina, Bioethics, Equidad, Telemedicine, Article, Education, Coronavirus, Clinical trials, R5-920, Síndrome respiratorio agudo grave, Investigación, L7-991, Bioética
Medicine (General), Fairness, SARS-CoV-2, Medicina, Research, COVID-19, Ensayos clínicos, Education (General), General Medicine, Telemedicina, Bioethics, Equidad, Telemedicine, Article, Education, Coronavirus, Clinical trials, R5-920, Síndrome respiratorio agudo grave, Investigación, L7-991, Bioética
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
