Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of the Ameri...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Myocardial Work in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Authors: Matthew Peters; M. Fuad Jan; Muddasir Ashraf; Heather Sanders; Sarah Roemer; McKenzie Schweitzer; James Adefisoye; +5 Authors

Myocardial Work in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Pressure-strain loop analysis is a novel echocardiographic technique to calculate myocardial work indices that has not been applied to patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM). We hypothesized that myocardial work indices differ between patients with ApHCM and those with non-ApHCM. This study aimed to (1) evaluate myocardial work indices in patients with ApHCM compared with those with non-ApHCM, (2) describe associations with relevant clinical variables, and (3) examine associations with significant late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.We retrospectively identified 48 patients with ApHCM and 69 with non-ApHCM who had measurements of global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency. We evaluated available cardiac magnetic resonance imaging data on 34 patients with ApHCM and 51 with non-ApHCM. Multivariable regression models correcting for traditional cardiac risk factors were used to evaluate the associations of myocardial work indices with relevant clinical variables.Median GLS (-11% vs -18%, P < .001), GWI (966 mm Hg% vs 1803 mm Hg%, P < .001), and GCW (1,050 mm Hg% vs 1,988 mm Hg%, P < .001) were significantly impaired in patients with ApHCM compared with those with non-ApHCM. Increasing N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, abnormal ultrasensitive troponin, and increasing maximal left ventricular wall thickness were significantly associated with reduced GWI and GCW in patients with ApHCM (P < .05). Global constructive work had only modest accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.70) to predict LGE in patients with ApHCM. However, in patients with non-ApHCM, GLS was the strongest predictor of LGE (AUC = 0.91), with a -17% cutoff yielding 81% sensitivity and 80% specificity.Myocardial work indices are significantly impaired in patients with ApHCM compared to those with non-ApHCM and correlate with important clinical variables. Global longitudinal strain, GWI, and GCW are more strongly predictive of fibrosis in patients with non-ApHCM than ApHCM.

Related Organizations
Keywords

apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Aurora UW Cardiology Faculty, Aurora Cardiology Fellows, left ventricular pressure strain loop, Aurora UW Electrophysiology Faculty, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Cardiology, echocardiography, Research Support Team, Nursing, Myocardial work, apical aneurysm

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!