
pmid: 25448786
There is a paucity of level 1 and level 2 evidence for best practice in surgical management of CDH. Antenatal imaging and prognostication is developing. Observed to expected lung-to-head ratio on ultrasound allows better predictive value over simple lung-to-head ratio. Based on 2 randomised studies, the verdict is still out in terms the best group and indication for antenatal intervention and their outcome. Tracheal occlusion is best suited for prospective randomised studies of benefit and outcome. Only one pilot randomised controlled study of thoracoscopic repair exists, suggesting increased acidosis; blood gases and CO2 levels should be closely monitored. Only poorly controlled retrospective studies suggest higher recurrence rates. Randomised studies on the outcome of thoracoscopic repair are needed. Careful selection, anaesthetic vigilance, monitoring and follow-up of these cases are required. There is no evidence to suggest the best patch material to decrease recurrences. Evidence suggests no benefit from routine fundoplication based on the one randomised study. Multi-disciplinary follow-up is required. This can be visits to different specialities, but may be best served by a multi-disciplinary one-stop clinic.
Postoperative Complications, Prenatal Diagnosis, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Guidelines as Topic, Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Postoperative Complications, Prenatal Diagnosis, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Guidelines as Topic, Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
