
pmid: 20832202
Marriage between biological relatives is widely popular in many parts of the world, with over 1000 million people living in countries where 20-50+% of unions are contracted between couples related as second cousins or closer. Consanguinity is, however, a controversial topic, in part due to public misunderstanding, complicated by often exaggerated past estimates of the adverse health outcomes. While some consanguineous couples are at high risk of conceiving a child with a genetic disorder, they are a small minority. Thus a multi-population meta-analysis has indicated an excess infant death rate of 1.1% in the progeny of first cousins, and even this figure may be compromised by inadequate control for non-genetic variables. The benefits as well as the disadvantages of consanguineous marriage are assessed and discussed, with specific consideration given to the health of migrant communities in Western countries, among whom first cousin marriage remains preferential.
Adult, Male, Emigrants and Immigrants, Reproductive Behavior, Neonatal and infant mortality, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Consanguinity, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Pregnancy, Infant Mortality, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Marriage, Reproductive behaviour, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Infant, UK migrants, 300, Survival Rate, Fetal Mortality, Female, Morbidity
Adult, Male, Emigrants and Immigrants, Reproductive Behavior, Neonatal and infant mortality, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Consanguinity, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Pregnancy, Infant Mortality, Medicine and Health Sciences, Humans, Marriage, Reproductive behaviour, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy Outcome, Infant, UK migrants, 300, Survival Rate, Fetal Mortality, Female, Morbidity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
