
pmid: 23507164
Employment rates among people with disabilities are low. Poor health is often cited as a barrier to work. Disability or a lack of disability-related resources may interfere with the ability to secure and maintain work.This paper presents an exploratory examination of the association between variation in service use and employment.The paper uses data from North Carolina Medicaid recipients age 18-64 who were eligible in fiscal year 2007 due to receipt of Supplemental Security Income (n = 60,190). Logistic regression was used to model employment as a function of variation in healthcare use, with conditional models stratifying by days of service use and unconditional models run by quantile of service use.People with the least service use (< 12 days) had the highest employment rate (over 20%); those with the most service use (≥54 days) had the lowest employment rate (7.8%). Those in between displayed remarkably little variation in employment rate by level of service use. The amount of week-to-week variation in service use was positively associated with the probability of employment.Among Medicaid enrollees with disabilities who use outpatient services, amount of service use is negatively associated with employment and variation in use is positively associated with employment. Future research involving more extensive administrative data, primary data collection, and the use of mixed methods would improve understanding of these findings.
Adult, Employment, Male, Persons with Disabilities, Adolescent, Medicaid, Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Medicare, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Insurance Coverage, United States, Young Adult, Logistic Models, North Carolina, Humans, Female
Adult, Employment, Male, Persons with Disabilities, Adolescent, Medicaid, Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Medicare, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Insurance Coverage, United States, Young Adult, Logistic Models, North Carolina, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
