<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Laboratory diagnosis of bovine viral diarrhea virus infections

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 2004Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, volume 20, pages 69-83 (issn: 0749-0720,

Authors: Jeremiah T. Saliki; Edward J. Dubovi;

doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2003.11.005

pmid: 15062475

Laboratory diagnosis of bovine viral diarrhea virus infections

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The past 20 years have witnessed dramatic improvements in laboratory methods for diagnosing bovine viral diarrhea virus(BVDV) infections. However, improvements in diagnostic technology have not necessarily led to improved diagnosis of BVDV at the individual animal or herd level. This article reviews BVDV laboratory diagnostic methods in the context of their rational application for improved detection of BVDV in the field.

Related Organizations

Cornell University
United States
Oklahoma State University–Stillwater
United States
Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City
United States

Keywords

Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral, Genotype, Gene Amplification, Antibodies, Viral, Diagnosis, Differential, DNA, Viral, Animals, RNA, Viral, Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease, Cattle, Antigens, Viral

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	89
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%