Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cryobiologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cryobiology
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Cryobiology
Article . 2005
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Parasite cryopreservation by vitrification

Authors: Eric R, James;

Parasite cryopreservation by vitrification

Abstract

Parasitic protozoa and helminths and parasitic/vector insects each have distinct requirements for cryopreservation. Most parasitic protozoa respond to cryopreservation stresses similarly to other single cell suspensions, but few species are currently routinely cryopreserved by protocols specifically designed for vitrification. With slow equilibrium cooling, some protozoa osmotically dehydrated by solutes concentrated in the residual unfrozen fraction will survive by vitrifying. Several species of helminths, together with insect embryos cannot be cryopreserved by slow cooling protocols and have an absolute requirement for vitrification. Studies incorporating slow cooling and stepped cooling of both protozoa and helminths, particularly the intraerythrocytic stages of malaria and the schistosomula larvae of Schistosoma mansoni have aided in the design of vitrification protocols for parasites. For helminths, the most widely used cryopreservation protocol, originally successful for cryopreserving S. mansoni schistosomula, consists of the addition of ethanediol in two steps, followed by rapid cooling (approximately 5100 degrees C min(-1)) to -196 degrees C. This technique exploits the temperature-dependent differential in permeability of the cryoprotectant additive (CPA) to first permeate into the organism at 37 degrees C followed by a dehydration-mediated internal CPA increase in concentration resulting from incubation in a second higher CPA concentration at 0 degree C. Samples are rapidly warmed/diluted (approximately 14,000 degrees C min(-1)) to recover the organisms from liquid nitrogen storage. Variations on this technique have also been successful in cryopreserving the larvae and adult worms of filariae, muscle stage larvae of Trichinella spp., the infective stages of gastro-intestinal nematode parasites and insect embryos. Other protocols where the dehydration step precedes CPA addition have been used to cryopreserve entomogenous nematode larvae by vitrification. Techniques that utilize high concentrations of CPA cocktails and slower cooling, developed for the vitrification of mammalian embryos, have been applied to the cryopreservation of parasitic protozoa, but with limited success to date. Where cryopreservation by classical slow cooling methods is possible, vitrification has enhanced the levels of survival obtained. And vitrification has enabled the successful cryopreservation of those parasitic species not able to be cryopreserved by traditional methods. Since a limited number of parasitic organisms has been cryopreserved using vitrification protocols, there is considerable scope for further improvement in the cryopreservation techniques used for many parasitic species.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cryopreservation, Nematoda, Temperature, Eukaryota, Cold Temperature, Cryoprotective Agents, Freezing, Animals, Ethylene Glycols, Parasites

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!