Picture–word interference and the response–exclusion hypothesis
Copyright policy )Picture–word interference and the response–exclusion hypothesis
In the picture-word interference task a to be named picture is presented along with a to be ignored superimposed distractor word. This task has been widely employed to investigate the architecture of the processes underlying word production. A new account of performance in the picture-word interference task has been recently put forward, the response-exclusion hypothesis. In this work, we test the response-exclusion hypothesis against a concise set of 5 published experimental results and show that it fails to account for some basic phenomena that are observed with the picture-word interference task.
- University of Trento Italy
- Macquarie University Australia
- University of Padua Italy
Mental Processes, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Stroop Test, Humans, Speech, Attention, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation
Mental Processes, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Stroop Test, Humans, Speech, Attention, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).35 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!