
Even though people with congenital prosopagnosia (CP) never develop a normal ability to "overtly" recognize faces, some individuals show indices of "covert" (or implicit) face recognition. The aim of this study was to demonstrate covert face recognition in CP when participants could not overtly recognize the faces.Eleven people with CP completed three tasks assessing their overt face recognition ability, and three tasks assessing their "covert" face recognition: a Forced choice familiarity task, a Forced choice cued task, and a Priming task.Evidence of covert recognition was observed with the Forced choice familiarity task, but not the Priming task. In addition, we propose that the Forced choice cued task does not measure covert processing as such, but instead "provoked-overt" recognition.Our study clearly shows that people with CP demonstrate covert recognition for faces that they cannot overtly recognize, and that behavioural tasks vary in their sensitivity to detect covert recognition in CP.
cognition, Adult, Male, Famous Persons, Neuropsychological Tests, Choice Behavior, Young Adult, male, neurologic examination, Humans, Famous Covert recognition, human, Face recognition, clinical article, covert face recognition, Keywords: adult, Forced choice task, article, Priming task, Australia, Recognition, Psychology, brain damage, Middle Aged, task performance, prosopagnosia, Prosopagnosia, female, Face, Female, recognition, Cues, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, congenital prosopagnosia
cognition, Adult, Male, Famous Persons, Neuropsychological Tests, Choice Behavior, Young Adult, male, neurologic examination, Humans, Famous Covert recognition, human, Face recognition, clinical article, covert face recognition, Keywords: adult, Forced choice task, article, Priming task, Australia, Recognition, Psychology, brain damage, Middle Aged, task performance, prosopagnosia, Prosopagnosia, female, Face, Female, recognition, Cues, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, congenital prosopagnosia
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
