Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Cortexarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cortex
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...
Other literature type . 2010
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The impact of self-citation

Authors: Jennifer A, Foley; Sergio, Della Sala;

The impact of self-citation

Abstract

Citation rates are used to calculate journal impact factors and for measuring the personal impact of individual scientists (Aksnes, 2003; Fowler and Aksnes, 2007), which can affect chances of academic appointments, advance in career, pay increases and grant funding (Hyland, 2003; Adler, 2009). However, the current method used to calculate citation rates has its limitations. The most widely used index published by the Institute of Scientific Information is the 2-year impact factor (Della Sala and Grafman, 2007, 2009) which calculates citation rate by summing the total citations during a given year to articles published in the previous two years and dividing this by the number of ‘source items’. What constitutes a ‘source item’ is unclear, but the number of source items can obviously affect citation rate (see Della Sala and Brooks, 2008), and can be manipulated to affect journal impact factor (see Brumback, 2009). Journal impact factors can also be highly influenced by the publication of a few highly cited papers (Buchtel and Della Sala, 2006) and it has been suggested that around 20% of all articles tend to account for 80% of all citations. In addition, it has been argued that the arbitrarily set time window of two-years disadvantages slowmoving disciplines, such as neuropsychology (Della Sala and Crawford, 2006, 2007; Della Sala and Grafman, 2009). Another factor that may affect citation rate is self-citation. Authors may choose to cite their own work in order to make their earlier work visible, to help reinforce an argument, to create an image of scientific authority (Hyland, 2003) or simply for self-aggrandizement (Hyland, 2003; Fowler and Aksnes, 2007). Self-citation can inflate the perception of an article’s or a scientist’s scientific impact, particularly when an article has many authors, increasing the possible number of self-citations (Schreiber, 2007; Della Sala and Brooks, 2008), and thus there have been calls to remove self-citations from citation rates (Schreiber, 2007). However, Fowler and Aksnes (2007)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Publishing, Time Factors, Bibliometrics, Journal Impact Factor, Periodicals as Topic, Authorship

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!