
The quadratic knapsack problem (QKP) is a well-known combinatorial optimization problem with numerous applications. Given its NP-hard nature, finding optimal solutions or even high quality suboptimal solutions to QKP in the general case is a highly challenging task. In this paper, we propose an iterated “hyperplane exploration” approach (IHEA) to solve QKP approximately. Instead of considering the whole solution space, the proposed approach adopts the idea of searching over a set of hyperplanes defined by a cardinality constraint to delimit the search to promising areas of the solution space. To explore these hyperplanes efficiently, IHEA employs a variable fixing strategy to reduce each hyperplane-constrained sub-problem and then applies a dedicated tabu search procedure to locate high quality solutions within the reduced solution space. Extensive experimental studies over three sets of 220 QKP instances indicate that IHEA competes very favorably with the state-of-the-art algorithms both in terms of solution quality and computing efficiency. We provide additional information to gain insight into the key components of the proposed approach.
Combinatorial optimization, quadratic knapsack problem, Integer programming, variable fixing, heuristics, Programming involving graphs or networks, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Quadratic knapsack problem, Hyperplane exploration, tabu search, hyperplane exploration, Heuristics, Boolean programming, Variable fixing
Combinatorial optimization, quadratic knapsack problem, Integer programming, variable fixing, heuristics, Programming involving graphs or networks, [INFO] Computer Science [cs], Quadratic knapsack problem, Hyperplane exploration, tabu search, hyperplane exploration, Heuristics, Boolean programming, Variable fixing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
